Project Knowledge

How to Structure Good Knowledge

The quality of your agent’s responses depends directly on how well your project knowledge is written. Even powerful AI agents won’t perform well if the content they’re trained on is unclear, bloated, or outdated. This guide shows you how to write, structure, and organize your GRUP project content for maximum clarity, performance, and brand alignment.

Principles of Good Knowledge

1. Be Clear and Concise

  • Avoid long-winded marketing phrases or jargon

  • Write in simple, direct language

  • Focus on facts, functions, and user-facing outcomes

2. Use Bullet Points

  • Bullet points are easier for agents to parse

  • Use them for features, steps, lists, and processes

Example:
Instead of: “Our staking system rewards loyal holders with multipliers and boosts across the ecosystem.”
Use:

  • Users earn rewards for staking

  • Staking increases based on holding duration

  • Boosts apply to in-game perks and governance weight

3. Organize by Topic

Break your content into labeled sections:

  • Overview

  • Token Utility

  • Product Features

  • FAQ

  • Roadmap

  • Links

This structure helps the agent respond more accurately and consistently.

4. Prioritize What Matters Most

Put high-priority content first. If there’s too much content, agents may not always “see” deeper sections.

  • Lead with your most asked questions

  • Explain what your product does in the first 2-3 lines

  • Link to external docs where more depth is needed

5. Keep It Up to Date

Outdated info leads to wrong replies. Make it a habit to:

  • Update your roadmap section after releases

  • Revise tokenomics if your model changes

  • Remove links to deprecated platforms or tools

Formats You Can Use in GRUP

You can input knowledge in multiple formats:

  • Plain text (recommended)

  • Markdown with headers, bold text, and bullets

  • File uploads (PDFs, .txt, .docx)

  • URLs to external content or docs

What to Avoid

  • Walls of unformatted text

  • Repetitive or vague marketing phrases

  • Over-explaining without actionable info

  • Technical terms without explanation

Table of Content

Table of Content

Table of Content